Skip to main content

Chinese leader: Greening China takes democracy

Trying to understand what goes on inside the heads of the Chinese is a major passtime in the Western corridors of power these days. One questions, perhaps, looms above all other: Will democracy eventually find her place in the land in the middle? After all, dealing with non-democracies is ever so much more unpredictable, and thus uncomfortable.

As it happens, the globally recognized Chinese Law Professor Wang Canfa does not hesitate to speak of the need for democratic reform in his home country when he travels the world. On the contrary, he draws a simple and obvious line between democratic shortfall and environmental disaster. One example, taken from his talk at McGill University on June 2nd: If local Chinese leaders are measured on their performance in terms of economic growth only, they have absolutely no interest in listening to the complaints of suffering farmers, whom they again is in no way answerable to. Wang Canfa is trying to change damaging mechanism by facilitating the actual enforcement of the extensive environmental legislation that already exists in China. This is done through his organisation CLAPV, the Center for Legal Assistance to Pollution Victims. Through collective lawsuits he is forcing the authorities to take the voice of regular people into account.

Why are we surprised, why is this a story worth passing on? Because many of us that are foreign to China would not expect the Chinese government to tolerate such talk - and definitely not such direct action. Listening to Wang Canfa, however, it turns out that China wants democracy. Only as long as it is a democarcy that does not hinder economic growth. Making this priority very concrete, Mr. Canfa gave the example that obtrusive tactics, such as sit-ins and demonstrations are not tolerated. Pursuing justice through court is, however, and when the many obstacles are overcome, no-one is principally against the working of a democratic court system. China wants democracy, but says no thanks to the tactics of social movements.

But where is this democracy to come from, one might ask, after having listened to Mr. Canfa's grim diagnosis of current policy making practises. On June 3rd in Montréal, people with Chinese roots or interests met to commemorate the victims of the massacre at Tiananmen Square that took place in Beijing exactly 20 years earlier, on June 3rd and 4th. First, the beautiful documentary Sunrise Over Tiananmen Square was shown, featuring amazing artwork and the dramatic lifestory of the artist himself. Then, in the following discussion round, an invited Taiwanese participant moved that China seems to lack a stable civil society that keeps the state in check. In her opinion, this civil society could grow out of either organizing the farmer culture in rural areas or, not least, the blogging culture on the Net. She shares the latter idea with democracy activist in-exile, Wang Dan, who claims there is "(an)other China...based on the Internet".

The efforts of Wang Canfa is touching on both the rural China and modern IT, as different as they may seem. Using organizational shortcuts, such as modern communication networks, his CLAPV provides environmental lawyers to assist rural populations in protecting their milieu against aggressive, centralized, state-controlled development all over China. Here, the trade-offs between democratic ideals and economic growth becomes as clear as in the sharp morning sunlight on Tiananmen. We cannot always have both, at least not when economic growth is measured with short term sensibility only. Currently, the governing Chinese Communist Party gives primacy to GDP growth. Wang Canfa wants to throw sustainability into the calculation. To do this, he convincingly shows, one needs real democracy and a civil society.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Official statistics: 51% of 16-74 year old Danes use Facebook

In making a case for why my MSc dissertation here at the Oxford Internet Institute should be concerned with something as hyped and mundane as Facebook, I've been looking for numbers on the Danish social media landscape.

On the English-language web, the commercial SocialBakers Facebook statistics suggest that 49% of the Danish population are on Facebook.

This rather non-transparent number can now be compared with a recent report by Statistics Denmark, suggesting that 51% of 16-74 year old Danes have a Facebook account. The second-largest online social network service in Denmark, LinkedIn, is trailing far behind at 8%. Most surprisingly perhaps, a mere 3% of the surveyed age cohort use Twitter.

As such, there are compelling quantitative reasons for choosing Facebook over e.g. Twitter for a case study of how social media reflect life in Denmark. Another recent survey produced for a Danish daily confirms this: A tiny elite of the 319 most active Twitter users in Denmark write half of …

Two (used) comments on Gillespie's new chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms"

I'm in Paris this semester, as a visiting doctoral student at the Center for the Sociology of Innovation (CSI) at Ecole des Mines and at the médialab at Sciences Po. 
Apart from finding myself in the middle of two very lively research communities, I've also been so lucky that a series of cross-institutional seminars on Digital Methods are taking place in Paris this spring.
The last seminar was on "Transformative interaction: web effects on social dynamics", for which I volunteered to prepare a brief comment on one of the selected readings, namely Tarleton Gillespie's chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms", forthcoming in an edited volume on "Media Technologies" to be published by MIT Press. (The full chapter has been uploaded by Gillespie here).
Since I prepared the comments in writing, and since they did in fact spark some discussion, I've decided that it might be appropriate to recycle them as a blog post. Here goes:

Introducing: The Twitter-thing!

Context: The Twitter-thing is the (awkward?) translation into English of 'Twittertinget' - a project I worked on last year with two Danish colleagues, Irina Papazu (CBS) and Tobias Bornakke (Uni. of Copenhagen) in collaboration with the Danish newspaper Politiken. The Twitter-thing is a tool that draws on TCAT in order to build a network visualisation of how Danish MPs use hashtags on Twitter. Here follows my abstract for the upcoming Data Publics conference in Lancaster, where I'll be exhibiting the Twitter-thing.


Parliaments could seem to be highly issue-agnostic places. All sorts of problems move in and out of these large and expensive devices (Dányi 2015), while the membership stays more or less the same in-between elections. But as issues are taken up and left behind by parliaments, they also make cuts in the parliament in the sense that specific sets of parliamentarians become attached to specific issues. The aim of the Twitter-thing tool is to trace these cuts and v…