Skip to main content

How about looking at Danish agriculture the way these Norwegians look at fish?

When handling climate change and other unintended consequences of our current way of upholding human existence, a part of our problems seem to stem from the way we produce food. This rather basic type of human praxis seem to have undergone huge transformations over the last century. As Norwegian researchers say: "Although natural resources have been exploited since the beginning of humanity, modern resource management is a recent phenomenon."

To appreciate these changes, we probably need to leave out the idyllic visions of small fishing villages in gorgeous Nordic fjords and look again at a new kind of "
process, where complex and heterogeneous networks link together nature, society, technology, science, markets, and policy in new ways" (same source as above).

In the same way, the Danish agricultural sector has more to do with lobbying, speculating, optimizing and handling large amounts of sticky substances than living the independent life on a family farm. As it turns out, independence was but an illusion.

How else might we explain a recent news story (in Danish), celebrating the building of a so-called 'Pig City' (also in Danish, but with illustrative illustrations) that combine swine and tomatoes in order to create a farm with a carbon/environmental footprint approaching zero? The concerns that led to this innovation certainly has to do with more than merely producing enough food to keep us alive. And the fact that it is widely celebrated hints to the relevance of a cyborg-analysis of the Danish agricultural sector.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Official statistics: 51% of 16-74 year old Danes use Facebook

In making a case for why my MSc dissertation here at the Oxford Internet Institute should be concerned with something as hyped and mundane as Facebook, I've been looking for numbers on the Danish social media landscape.

On the English-language web, the commercial SocialBakers Facebook statistics suggest that 49% of the Danish population are on Facebook.

This rather non-transparent number can now be compared with a recent report by Statistics Denmark, suggesting that 51% of 16-74 year old Danes have a Facebook account. The second-largest online social network service in Denmark, LinkedIn, is trailing far behind at 8%. Most surprisingly perhaps, a mere 3% of the surveyed age cohort use Twitter.

As such, there are compelling quantitative reasons for choosing Facebook over e.g. Twitter for a case study of how social media reflect life in Denmark. Another recent survey produced for a Danish daily confirms this: A tiny elite of the 319 most active Twitter users in Denmark write half of …

Two (used) comments on Gillespie's new chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms"

I'm in Paris this semester, as a visiting doctoral student at the Center for the Sociology of Innovation (CSI) at Ecole des Mines and at the médialab at Sciences Po. 
Apart from finding myself in the middle of two very lively research communities, I've also been so lucky that a series of cross-institutional seminars on Digital Methods are taking place in Paris this spring.
The last seminar was on "Transformative interaction: web effects on social dynamics", for which I volunteered to prepare a brief comment on one of the selected readings, namely Tarleton Gillespie's chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms", forthcoming in an edited volume on "Media Technologies" to be published by MIT Press. (The full chapter has been uploaded by Gillespie here).
Since I prepared the comments in writing, and since they did in fact spark some discussion, I've decided that it might be appropriate to recycle them as a blog post. Here goes:

Introducing: The Twitter-thing!

Context: The Twitter-thing is the (awkward?) translation into English of 'Twittertinget' - a project I worked on last year with two Danish colleagues, Irina Papazu (CBS) and Tobias Bornakke (Uni. of Copenhagen) in collaboration with the Danish newspaper Politiken. The Twitter-thing is a tool that draws on TCAT in order to build a network visualisation of how Danish MPs use hashtags on Twitter. Here follows my abstract for the upcoming Data Publics conference in Lancaster, where I'll be exhibiting the Twitter-thing.


Parliaments could seem to be highly issue-agnostic places. All sorts of problems move in and out of these large and expensive devices (Dányi 2015), while the membership stays more or less the same in-between elections. But as issues are taken up and left behind by parliaments, they also make cuts in the parliament in the sense that specific sets of parliamentarians become attached to specific issues. The aim of the Twitter-thing tool is to trace these cuts and v…