Skip to main content

”Internet Means Everything” - When Asylum Seekers Use the Internet

Here follows a short English abstract of my Danish bachelor thesis, which I defended last week at the Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen.

Abstract
This paper presents a case study on how asylum seekers in Denmark use the Internet. Drawing on the empirical sociology of Bruno Latour, examples of ’grand theorizing’ on the subject are discussed and confronted with new data. Based on 14 qualitative interviews and participant observation in an asylum centre internet café and among the editorial staff of an asylum seeker newspaper, several concrete stories of Internet use are fleshed out and analyzed. The results are condensated into 7 types of Internet praxis among asylum seekers. They indicate that the Internet is of significant importance for the asylum seekers, who go online to improve their language and IT skills, explore Danish culture, stay in touch with family members and sometimes even inform their case. The paper also establish the existence of several barriers to the use of the Internet by asylum seekers, prominent examples of which are poor connectivity, lack of IT knowledge, rigid management systems and weak understanding of Danish and English. These barriers problematize the alleged potential of the Internet to break down national borders and be equally accessible to all. On the other hand, the demonstration of active engagement with the Internet challenges the notion of asylum seekers as passive captives of nation states.

During my preparation for the defence (which was less dramatic than it sounds - more of a constructive discussion), I incidentally came across a recently published Australian research project covering the same rarely investigated subject of internet-using asylum seekers. Perhaps we are witnessing the birth of a new research subfield?

The project also calls itself a pilot study and bears the full title: "Technology's Refuge - The Use of Technology by Asylum Seekers and Refugees". It is larger in scale than my study, but comes to many similar conclusions. The Australian report can be downloaded here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Official statistics: 51% of 16-74 year old Danes use Facebook

In making a case for why my MSc dissertation here at the Oxford Internet Institute should be concerned with something as hyped and mundane as Facebook, I've been looking for numbers on the Danish social media landscape.

On the English-language web, the commercial SocialBakers Facebook statistics suggest that 49% of the Danish population are on Facebook.

This rather non-transparent number can now be compared with a recent report by Statistics Denmark, suggesting that 51% of 16-74 year old Danes have a Facebook account. The second-largest online social network service in Denmark, LinkedIn, is trailing far behind at 8%. Most surprisingly perhaps, a mere 3% of the surveyed age cohort use Twitter.

As such, there are compelling quantitative reasons for choosing Facebook over e.g. Twitter for a case study of how social media reflect life in Denmark. Another recent survey produced for a Danish daily confirms this: A tiny elite of the 319 most active Twitter users in Denmark write half of …

Two (used) comments on Gillespie's new chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms"

I'm in Paris this semester, as a visiting doctoral student at the Center for the Sociology of Innovation (CSI) at Ecole des Mines and at the médialab at Sciences Po. 
Apart from finding myself in the middle of two very lively research communities, I've also been so lucky that a series of cross-institutional seminars on Digital Methods are taking place in Paris this spring.
The last seminar was on "Transformative interaction: web effects on social dynamics", for which I volunteered to prepare a brief comment on one of the selected readings, namely Tarleton Gillespie's chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms", forthcoming in an edited volume on "Media Technologies" to be published by MIT Press. (The full chapter has been uploaded by Gillespie here).
Since I prepared the comments in writing, and since they did in fact spark some discussion, I've decided that it might be appropriate to recycle them as a blog post. Here goes:

Introducing: The Twitter-thing!

Context: The Twitter-thing is the (awkward?) translation into English of 'Twittertinget' - a project I worked on last year with two Danish colleagues, Irina Papazu (CBS) and Tobias Bornakke (Uni. of Copenhagen) in collaboration with the Danish newspaper Politiken. The Twitter-thing is a tool that draws on TCAT in order to build a network visualisation of how Danish MPs use hashtags on Twitter. Here follows my abstract for the upcoming Data Publics conference in Lancaster, where I'll be exhibiting the Twitter-thing.


Parliaments could seem to be highly issue-agnostic places. All sorts of problems move in and out of these large and expensive devices (Dányi 2015), while the membership stays more or less the same in-between elections. But as issues are taken up and left behind by parliaments, they also make cuts in the parliament in the sense that specific sets of parliamentarians become attached to specific issues. The aim of the Twitter-thing tool is to trace these cuts and v…