Several
’Mapping Controversies’ courses have been taught in Copenhagen for some time
now, at various places and with various titles. Earlier this week some of the
people involved in these efforts sat down for a one-day seminar to discuss
whether there is something under the umbrella of ’Mapping Controversies’ that
can be taken from an existence as pedagogical tools towards research
contributions (at this point I am using ’Mapping Controversies’ as a
placeholder for multiple activities instead of offering an authoritative
definition).
The seminar was funded by the Digital Humanities Lab Denmark (DigHumLab) and hosted by the Techno-Anthropology Research Group (TANT) at Aalborg University Copenhagen. For a ’Mapping Controversies’ teacher and practitioner such as myself, the seminar came across as a rare chance to discuss among peers where our work might be heading. Here follows an account of the discussions.
The day started with Anders Kristian Munk’s keynote, which played with the idea o…
The seminar was funded by the Digital Humanities Lab Denmark (DigHumLab) and hosted by the Techno-Anthropology Research Group (TANT) at Aalborg University Copenhagen. For a ’Mapping Controversies’ teacher and practitioner such as myself, the seminar came across as a rare chance to discuss among peers where our work might be heading. Here follows an account of the discussions.
The day started with Anders Kristian Munk’s keynote, which played with the idea o…