Skip to main content

Introducing: The Twitter-thing!

Context: The Twitter-thing is the (awkward?) translation into English of 'Twittertinget' - a project I worked on last year with two Danish colleagues, Irina Papazu (CBS) and Tobias Bornakke (Uni. of Copenhagen) in collaboration with the Danish newspaper Politiken. The Twitter-thing is a tool that draws on TCAT in order to build a network visualisation of how Danish MPs use hashtags on Twitter. Here follows my abstract for the upcoming Data Publics conference in Lancaster, where I'll be exhibiting the Twitter-thing.

Parliaments could seem to be highly issue-agnostic places. All sorts of problems move in and out of these large and expensive devices (Dányi 2015), while the membership stays more or less the same in-between elections. But as issues are taken up and left behind by parliaments, they also make cuts in the parliament in the sense that specific sets of parliamentarians become attached to specific issues. The aim of the Twitter-thing tool is to trace these cuts and visualize them by means of Twitter hashtags and a piece of code developed by Tobias Bornakke while visiting the médialab at Sciences Po in Paris.

Screendump of the tool. Click to interact with it.
What the Twitter-thing tool does, is to track all tweets sent by parliamentarians in Denmark and then visualize the individual parliamentarians in a network together with the hashtags, they have used. In this network, a link is made between the name of an MP and a hashtag when this MP has used the specific hashtag in a tweet. In other words, the tool visualizes how parliamentarians group around specific topics and issues by using hashtags.

As such, the Twitter-thing seeks to explore the following question: What if the parliament was approached not as a representation device for the population of a nation, but as an assembly of multiple and constantly transforming issue publics (Marres 2007)? What kinds of issues are highlighted by the parliament via Twitter, and what would it mean to ask a parliament to represent issues, or indeed ’things’ (Latour 2005), instead of a populace?

The resulting publics – or things in the sense of a collective aroused by an issue – are data publics in the sense that they are not aware of themselves as specific publics (Warner 2002). At the same time, it is entirely possible to self-select membership of these data publics by using a specific hashtag. This raises the question of what feedback loops are in place between visualizations of the use of hashtags and decisions to use hashtags in tweets, including the question of how a tool like the Twitter-thing might change things.

The Twitter-thing invites users to explore these questions, and more, by making the network available in an interactive format that allows users to browse at their own leisure, zoom in and out, search for particular politicians, parties or hashtags, narrow down the network and make screenshots. As such, the Twitter-thing is an experiment with re-tooling the parliament into a more issue-oriented device.

Outro: I'm still thinking about how to exhibit this in the best possible way at the Data Publics conference. Any thoughts and ideas are most welcome in the comments! 


Popular posts from this blog

Official statistics: 51% of 16-74 year old Danes use Facebook

In making a case for why my MSc dissertation here at the Oxford Internet Institute should be concerned with something as hyped and mundane as Facebook, I've been looking for numbers on the Danish social media landscape.

On the English-language web, the commercial SocialBakers Facebook statistics suggest that 49% of the Danish population are on Facebook.

This rather non-transparent number can now be compared with a recent report by Statistics Denmark, suggesting that 51% of 16-74 year old Danes have a Facebook account. The second-largest online social network service in Denmark, LinkedIn, is trailing far behind at 8%. Most surprisingly perhaps, a mere 3% of the surveyed age cohort use Twitter.

As such, there are compelling quantitative reasons for choosing Facebook over e.g. Twitter for a case study of how social media reflect life in Denmark. Another recent survey produced for a Danish daily confirms this: A tiny elite of the 319 most active Twitter users in Denmark write half of …

Two (used) comments on Gillespie's new chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms"

I'm in Paris this semester, as a visiting doctoral student at the Center for the Sociology of Innovation (CSI) at Ecole des Mines and at the médialab at Sciences Po. 
Apart from finding myself in the middle of two very lively research communities, I've also been so lucky that a series of cross-institutional seminars on Digital Methods are taking place in Paris this spring.
The last seminar was on "Transformative interaction: web effects on social dynamics", for which I volunteered to prepare a brief comment on one of the selected readings, namely Tarleton Gillespie's chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms", forthcoming in an edited volume on "Media Technologies" to be published by MIT Press. (The full chapter has been uploaded by Gillespie here).
Since I prepared the comments in writing, and since they did in fact spark some discussion, I've decided that it might be appropriate to recycle them as a blog post. Here goes: