Skip to main content

Paper Workshop Announcement: STS and Democracy

Politics has been conceptualized in incredibly broad terms in STS (Brown 2015). At the same time, the more specific question of democratic politics has often been left under-explored, allowing notions such as public participation to be imported as “off the shelf” ideals in STS (Marres 2012:ix). In this workshop, we ask what it would mean to work with democracy not as an implicit repository of ideals, but as an explicit object of study in STS. We ask how democratic politics can be understood and studied based on the practice-oriented empirical commitments and conceptual repertoires of STS. Such an effort might require a redescription of democratic political institutions and concepts, paying close attention to the situated practices and entanglements that their operations require. Despite a number of notable contributions in recent years, we believe that the vast majority of the work on what STS has to offer democracy is yet to be done.

Format 

The purpose of the workshop is to invite 10-20 scholars to meet and improve their individual chapter contributions through mutual discussion. Abstracts are invited from scholars in and around the field of STS. Thus far, we anticipate contributions concerning such diverse topics as: election systems, media publics, participatory processes in renewable energy projects, algorithmic diplomacy, and Max Weber’s potential significance for STS. We strongly encourage further contributions, also from early career scholars. We furthermore hope to welcome scholars from a wide array of European countries. Accepted participants will be invited to Copenhagen to spend two days presenting and discussing each others’ drafts/short chapters. In 2018, there will be a new invitation issued to submit revised/full chapters for peer review, and the anthology will then be submitted to an international academic publisher.

Important dates and information 

  • Abstract (500 words) submission deadline: 1st June 2017 (submit to ab@learning.aau.dk) 
  • Notification of acceptance: 1st July 2017 
  • Short chapter draft (5-10 pages) submission deadline: 1st November 2017 
  • Workshop dates: 23rd-24th November 2017 
  • Workshop location: Aalborg University Copenhagen, A. C. Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen SV, Denmark 
The workshop is sponsored by The European Association for the Study of Science and Technology (The Annual EASST Fund); Department of Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University; Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School.



Lunch, refreshments and a dinner will be provided. We may have a very limited amount of funding available to help participants with travel costs. Please let us know in your abstract submission if you require such help, and we will try to make ends meet as best we can.

Organizers 

  • Dr. Andreas Birkbak, Techno-Anthropology Research Group, Dept. of Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University Copenhagen. (ab@learning.aau.dk)
  • Dr. Irina Papazu, Dept. of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School. (ip.mpp@cbs.dk)
  • Dr. Anne Kathrine Pihl Vadgaard, IT University of Copenhagen. (anneknielsen@gmail.com)

Download the call as PDF: https://www.dropbox.com/s/gj3ypfhw5kysgaz/STS%20and%20Democracy%20-%20Paper%20workshop%20announcement%202017.pdf?dl=0

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Official statistics: 51% of 16-74 year old Danes use Facebook

In making a case for why my MSc dissertation here at the Oxford Internet Institute should be concerned with something as hyped and mundane as Facebook, I've been looking for numbers on the Danish social media landscape.

On the English-language web, the commercial SocialBakers Facebook statistics suggest that 49% of the Danish population are on Facebook.

This rather non-transparent number can now be compared with a recent report by Statistics Denmark, suggesting that 51% of 16-74 year old Danes have a Facebook account. The second-largest online social network service in Denmark, LinkedIn, is trailing far behind at 8%. Most surprisingly perhaps, a mere 3% of the surveyed age cohort use Twitter.

As such, there are compelling quantitative reasons for choosing Facebook over e.g. Twitter for a case study of how social media reflect life in Denmark. Another recent survey produced for a Danish daily confirms this: A tiny elite of the 319 most active Twitter users in Denmark write half of …

Two (used) comments on Gillespie's new chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms"

I'm in Paris this semester, as a visiting doctoral student at the Center for the Sociology of Innovation (CSI) at Ecole des Mines and at the médialab at Sciences Po. 
Apart from finding myself in the middle of two very lively research communities, I've also been so lucky that a series of cross-institutional seminars on Digital Methods are taking place in Paris this spring.
The last seminar was on "Transformative interaction: web effects on social dynamics", for which I volunteered to prepare a brief comment on one of the selected readings, namely Tarleton Gillespie's chapter "The Relevance of Algorithms", forthcoming in an edited volume on "Media Technologies" to be published by MIT Press. (The full chapter has been uploaded by Gillespie here).
Since I prepared the comments in writing, and since they did in fact spark some discussion, I've decided that it might be appropriate to recycle them as a blog post. Here goes:

Introducing: The Twitter-thing!

Context: The Twitter-thing is the (awkward?) translation into English of 'Twittertinget' - a project I worked on last year with two Danish colleagues, Irina Papazu (CBS) and Tobias Bornakke (Uni. of Copenhagen) in collaboration with the Danish newspaper Politiken. The Twitter-thing is a tool that draws on TCAT in order to build a network visualisation of how Danish MPs use hashtags on Twitter. Here follows my abstract for the upcoming Data Publics conference in Lancaster, where I'll be exhibiting the Twitter-thing.


Parliaments could seem to be highly issue-agnostic places. All sorts of problems move in and out of these large and expensive devices (Dányi 2015), while the membership stays more or less the same in-between elections. But as issues are taken up and left behind by parliaments, they also make cuts in the parliament in the sense that specific sets of parliamentarians become attached to specific issues. The aim of the Twitter-thing tool is to trace these cuts and v…